In my ultimately futile effort to conclude my two-part Solstice-inspired series before Imbolc, here’s the other half of what I was led to reflect on during my trip to San Francisco this Yule.
I’ve long had a complicated, difficult relationship with what’s usually called the Sacred Masculine. A lot of Pagan practice, especially that related to or derived from Wicca, very much centres the notion of the Sacred Masculine as an essential and basic concept along with the Sacred Feminine in a duality that’s seen as the root of nature.
In many ways that’s understandable and very useful to many. But for me it’s always been difficult to relate to. I’ve previously related an especially revelatory incident in which it was assumed that I, as a man, would naturally be drawn to the Sacred Masculine, and how thoroughly that didn’t work.
Sadly, even where we manage to avoid the grosser patriarchal aspects that most of us are trying to get away from, we often present the Sacred Masculine in a way that concentrates on very specific traits or aspects of the world that are culturally defined as lower-case-m masculine.
Now, no doubt this works out well for a lot of men (of whom no doubt a lot of trans men, as well as masculinity-involved queer or genderqueer people, find it specifically empowering to concentrate on masculinity), but it also leaves a lot of us completely cold.
My gender is not about running-jumping-climbing-trees and even less about competition, bloodletting, or self-sacrifice, roles often assigned to the Sacred Masculine in many times and places. Nor is it something that means that I will just naturally be drawn to the Sacred Masculine in the same way that other men may be.
So for a long time I’ve more or less completely left the Sacred Masculine, as such, out of my work. But in a way, that’s only a temporary solution. I identify as male, so it follows that I have a male side, if only to that extent. And if I believe my whole being (like everything else) is part of the divine, that aspect of me must be as well. But how do I work that out for myself?
Part of that came through for me at Solstice, which is one of the holidays of our solar year most focused on the Sacred Masculine. It’s the rebirth of the Sun, the central male figure in much of Neopagan practice, when we vigil to ensure the Sun rises once more; and whether it’s the birth of the new god or the defeat of the old sun by the new, these are stories of the Sacred Masculine we are telling.
So it’s only fitting that this was a time I felt filled by what I could only identify as male energy. But it was distinctly not patriarchal energy, or competitive or bloodletting energy, or a rejection of my femmeness or genderqueerness, or any of those things that I’ve always dissociated so hard from. It was so comfortable and invigorating for me, and that’s what I found remarkable.
I guess if I could sum it up, it would be to say that if there is a Masculine Divine, He must include all the ways of being male, identifying as male, that there can possibly ever be. The God is a drag queen. The God is a nancy boy, a power bottom, a genderqueer faggot, a foofy decorator, a Radical Faerie, a lover-not-a-fighter, as much as he is any of the more normative images we’re used to having, all at once.
(And to follow up on last week’s entry – obviously, He’s a trans man as well. My brothers who are trans are as clear avatars of the masculine divine as any cis man, and it’s high time we noticed that in pagan practice.)
The divinity of my queerness can and very strongly does come through my relationship with the Goddess or with Sacred Third-Gender, but I think it has also got to come through the God. I have got to queer my knowledge of the God.
And I feel that, in certain ways — by no means abandoning my genderqueer identity, my reservations about maleness and manhood for myself — this will let me knit my gender together in a way I haven’t felt comfortable doing yet. At Solstice, I felt like this was letting me in some way draw on a power or reserve I hadn’t had access to before.
This is not without its challenges. Far too often, men’s rediscovering our relationship to the God has been framed as rediscovering our capacity to conform to the running-jumping-climbing-trees image I described above, when it hasn’t been out-and-out masculinist. (“Paganism has become too woman-oriented! We have to recreate a place for the manly virtues!”, and other such uncomfortable nonsense. I once went to something billed as a Men’s Mystery which ended up being – to be fair, against the organizer’s apparent intent – a locker room environment in which misogynistic humour was given free play. Someone even told an offensive sexist joke about the Goddess. I was pretty damn shaken, and it was a big part of what put me off men’s anything in Paganism for a long time.)
This is so far from what I mean that it isn’t funny. The difficulty is in articulating what I want to do without its coming off as more of the same – in fact, making it clear that I mean the opposite of that: not abandoning my genderqueerness or reservations about maleness, but having a sense of my maleness that includes and values them; not tritely “rediscovering” “manhood” and the “manly virtues” (as if anyone with social power had succeeded in dismissing them), but stretching my knowledge of the masculine divine to encompass my being and the full spectrum of deprecated and marginalized but gorgeous male beings it has been my privilege to come to know.
So here’s my attempt: to the extent that I identify as a man, it follows that I am of the God, not at all despite but utterly in and through all my femme, faggot, genderqueer glory. Learn to see Him as He is: He can wear my form, He can speak in my words, He can have the same reservations about manhood as I do.
The God is Queer. He’s beautiful and He looks completely different from what we thought.
It’s going to be a long journey.

12 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 1, 2011 at 2:55 pm
In Our Own Image: transcentric Paganism « foxfetch
[...] us over yet again, and I have had enough. This has been brewing in me for a while, after reading this fabulous post, and now I pour it out for [...]
March 2, 2011 at 3:27 pm
verdant1
“…He looks completely different from what we thought.”
This. Absolutely this.
Thanks for sharing so openly. I get so frustrated with thsoe who try to limit the expression of divinity so it fits their comfort-zones. In my experience, divinity is rarely comfortable – comforting, yes, at times. Just not comfortable.
Confession time: I’m a hetero cis goddess focused pagan woman – but that doess’t make what you wrote any less true!
Keep up the good work!
And I’ll be reading more…
March 2, 2011 at 9:21 pm
femmeguy
Well said, and thanks!
March 3, 2011 at 3:29 pm
verdant1
My favourite religious joke is the one about the person coming back from the dead and being asked what God was like:
“Well, for starters, she’s black”
March 2, 2011 at 5:58 pm
On the signal boosting front « Cultural Inappropriation
[...] has some interesting thoughts on the Sacred Masculine, that pretty neatly dovetail what I was talking about regarding the [...]
March 3, 2011 at 8:19 pm
theconsciencevote
How incredibly beautiful. I read this to my partner, who got a little bit teary. We’re both genderqueer, and as pagans, often feel quite alienated by the representations of deity we’re given.
My partner’s always struggled with the rather narrow idea of the God. Although he does identify with the running/dancing/hunting aspect, he’s expressed his own frustration with the lack of representation of anything else, things he feels in himself.
March 4, 2011 at 6:00 am
Yewtree
I love this post, and I completely agree that maleness includes genderqueer and femme and any other way of expressing yourself that you choose.
I am female but also bisexual and genderqueer – I think femaleness should include “masculine” expressions such as butch and boi and so on.
Actually I want to get rid of the gender-binary approach and start again, but in the meantime let’s have a rainbow or a kaleidoscope of many different expressions of what it means to perform a gender.
March 4, 2011 at 11:19 am
femmeguy
Thanks for your comment! I just wanted to point out, though, that what I’m in favour of is not so much dismantling the binary as rendering it consensual.
There are billions of people for whom a binary gender works and is important. That in itself makes the binary genders magically and religiously powerful. What we need to do, IMHO, is 1) provide options outside the binary that are accessible and respected; 2) ensure comfortable, safe, and respected access to the binary genders for all who need them, so that their boundaries are not policed.
What I argue in this post, for example, is that a non-binary approach may well not work and be uncomfortable for people who are non-consensually prevented from accessing binary gender: binary-identified transsexual people, for example, whose gender is called into question routinely against their will. (Witness Z. Budapest saying why can’t you just do trans things and leave us alone? why do those trans women need into women’s space? [answer: because they're women.])
It’s related to what foxfetch is calling for in this beautiful post: access to image of binary-gendered Deities that are transsexual in nature. So the work is not only to provide non-binary space; the work is also to make binary space accessible.
Conversely, where you say, “I think femaleness should include “masculine” expressions such as butch and boi and so on” — I certainly agree with you, provided once more that this inclusion is done consensually. I should probably have emphasized this more in my post, but as you know there are plenty of GQ people who identify as GQ, butch, boi, etc., because they don’t want to be included in the image of female or male. I would not want my post to be interpreted as meaning that they must be englobed into a female or male deity if they don’t want to.
At the same time, for those of us like you and me who do find space for ourselves in one of the binary genders, the boundaries of that gender, and that image of deity, must not be policed as if to tell us that we’re doing it wrong.
March 5, 2011 at 2:16 pm
sadie.sabot
I ended up here through following all the pantheacon posts and threads. this post is great and this part just made me cry:
“I guess if I could sum it up, it would be to say that if there is a Masculine Divine, He must include all the ways of being male, identifying as male, that there can possibly ever be. The God is a drag queen. The God is a nancy boy, a power bottom, a genderqueer faggot, a foofy decorator, a Radical Faerie, a lover-not-a-fighter, as much as he is any of the more normative images we’re used to having, all at once.
(And to follow up on last week’s entry – obviously, He’s a trans man as well. My brothers who are trans are as clear avatars of the masculine divine as any cis man, and it’s high time we noticed that in pagan practice.)”
I come to this from a very different corner; female assigned and female presenting/read and gender queer; this really impacted me because while it never actually occurred to me before, *of course* the male/masculine divine is all of those things. This has a big impact on how I feel about calling in the god/male diety during ritual. Anyway, obviously I’m having my own process here.
thanks for your writing.
March 7, 2011 at 2:03 pm
femmeguy
I’m really glad you liked it! thanks for the e-hugs.
And do refer to Raven Kaldera’s Hermaphrodeities and Will Roscoe’s Queer Spirits for lots more information on divine third-gender.
March 7, 2011 at 12:47 pm
Thaniel
LOVE THIS! We SO have not gone through all that we have to be ourselves, just to be brow-beaten into the falsehood that only certain aspects of our nature are Sacred. Feh on that! The Sacred is big enough to contain all of us; the only question is are WE big enough to contain The Sacred? Big points to you for pointing out ways to experience The Sacred that many haven’t considered.
March 7, 2011 at 2:04 pm
femmeguy
I’m glad it’s useful, thanks for the hearts!